Strategic advisory
We establish where security in your organization is heading and in what order to build it. A roadmap, priorities, budget and a rationale for the board — instead of a list of products to buy.
Read the details →We advise, select technology, implement, assess maturity, test and train. Always in that order — technology is the last step, not the first.
We provide advisory, technology selection, solution implementation, maturity analysis and assessment, testing and training.
We establish where security in your organization is heading and in what order to build it. A roadmap, priorities, budget and a rationale for the board — instead of a list of products to buy.
Read the details →Compliance analysis, organizational maturity assessment, gap analysis and certification readiness assessment — for ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, NIS2, DORA, UKSC and the AI Act.
Read the details →We check whether what is declared in the documentation actually works in the configuration: detection rules, segmentation, access control, backups.
Read the details →We design the target security architecture and select the technologies for it — taking into account what you already have.
Read the details →We implement the selected solutions: configuration, integration with the existing environment, migration, acceptance testing and handover to operations.
Read the details →Training for technical teams and the whole organization — from operating the implemented tools to recognizing phishing and using GenAI safely.
Read the details →Four steps — from the first conversation to a working implementation. Technology is the last step, not the first.
We establish what the organization already has, what it is worried about and what it is obliged to do by regulation. Free of charge, with no obligations.
Maturity assessment, threat analysis and risk profile. The result is a list of gaps ordered by severity.
Target architecture plus a selection of solutions for the existing environment, budget and business goals.
Configuration, integration, testing, team training and operational documentation. Maintenance — if you need it.
For those reading further: what exactly each service covers and what the organization gets from it. Expand the item you are interested in.
A cybersecurity strategy matched to the risk profile and business goals: a roadmap of initiatives for 12–36 months, prioritization of investments according to real risk (not according to a vendor catalog), support in conversations with the board and the supervisory board, and preparation of budget justifications. We also advise on regulatory requirements — NIS2, DORA, UKSC and the AI Act — indicating which obligations apply to the organization and in what time horizon.
The board knows where the money goes and why in that order. The IT team gets a plan that can be defended before an auditor, a regulator and its own CFO.
Four types of review, separately or as a package: compliance analysis against a specific regulatory requirement (NIS2, DORA, UKSC, AI Act, GDPR), an assessment of the organization's maturity against recognized frameworks (including NIST CSF), gap analysis — the difference between the current and the required state — and a certification readiness assessment before a formal ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 42001 audit, including a mock audit and a documentation review. A comprehensive security audit combines these reviews into one — technical and organizational.
A list of gaps ordered by severity, with a plan to close them and an estimate of the effort. The organization goes into the certification audit knowing what it will hear — instead of finding out during it.
Technical verification of existing implementations against cybersecurity requirements: whether the detection rules in the SIEM really detect what they are supposed to, whether network segmentation matches the diagrams, whether permissions follow the principle of least privilege, whether backups can actually be restored within the declared time. We check the configuration, not a checklist — paper compliance without working technology does not pass.
A hard picture of the difference between documentation and reality. Every finding comes with evidence and a specific remediation recommendation, not a generality.
Design of the target architecture and selection of specific solutions from the technologies we know from implementations — from logically resilient backup, through SIEM/XDR and privileged access management, to protection of industrial OT environments. Every solution is selected individually, taking into account the existing architecture, threat analysis, the organization's maturity level, risk profile and business goals. We do not replace working components just because they come from a different vendor.
An architecture that can be maintained, and a shopping list with a rationale for every item — instead of a collection of unconnected products.
The full implementation cycle: installation and configuration, integration with the existing environment (identity directories, SIEM, ticketing systems), migration of data and policies from legacy solutions, acceptance testing with the client's team, and handover to operations with complete operational documentation. We implement the technologies of the vendors we work with every day — the full list is in the Key vendors and Solutions sections.
A working implementation accepted through testing — not "installed and left behind". The team knows how to use it, and the documentation allows the system to be maintained without us.
Two streams. Technical training — operating and maintaining the implemented solutions, for IT/Security teams. And building awareness across the whole organization: recognizing phishing and smishing, defending against multi-channel social engineering attacks (TOAD, deepfake vishing) and using GenAI tools safely — which data may be passed to a model and which never. We base awareness programs on, among others, the Nimblr platform with attack simulations and micro-trainings delivered at the moment a mistake is made.
The employee stops being the weakest link. A measurable quarter-on-quarter drop in the click rate of simulated attacks — that is the metric we report.
Every technology solution implemented in an organization should be selected individually — taking into account the existing architecture, threat analysis, the organization's maturity level, risk profile and the client's business goals. That is a principle we make no exceptions to.
Every implementation is designed individually — for your existing architecture, risk profile and business goals.